<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Twenty Palaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about stuff, things, books, and other randomness (by author Harry Connolly)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9245</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9245</guid>
		<description>I may steal that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may steal that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by vath</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9195</link>
		<dc:creator>vath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9195</guid>
		<description>Well, if we can get enough votes to squeeze out a win, and you&#039;re up for writing another matchup, I think you could work in moriane using balefire so powerful on tyrion, for mouthing off to her, that he was burnt all the way back to right before ray dies, effectively shunting him into the matchup with no idea how he got there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we can get enough votes to squeeze out a win, and you&#8217;re up for writing another matchup, I think you could work in moriane using balefire so powerful on tyrion, for mouthing off to her, that he was burnt all the way back to right before ray dies, effectively shunting him into the matchup with no idea how he got there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9179</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9179</guid>
		<description>Lev Grossman already wrote his character losing to Kull in round one. She won in votes, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lev Grossman already wrote his character losing to Kull in round one. She won in votes, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9178</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9178</guid>
		<description>Wow. The other day I jokingly said (in response to the ruckus about the Kellhus fight) that &quot;Nobody is going to write that their character loses&quot;.

Good job proving me wrong :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. The other day I jokingly said (in response to the ruckus about the Kellhus fight) that &#8220;Nobody is going to write that their character loses&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good job proving me wrong :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>Dum dum DUUUUMMMMMM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dum dum DUUUUMMMMMM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Death of Ray Lilly by D. D. Syrdal</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator>D. D. Syrdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6201#comment-9168</guid>
		<description>Wow you scared me with that Twitter headline ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you scared me with that Twitter headline ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Blog Project: Creativity by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6071#comment-9125</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6071#comment-9125</guid>
		<description>I wanted to make a couple of responses here: 

First, this is going to be a series of posts, so I&#039;ll be talking about working in the near future. It&#039;s separate from the issue of whether a person *can* be creative. 

Second, once you start talking about how people become successful, now to define success, and what motivates successful people, you venture onto very thin ice. None of this is simple or straightforward. 

Third, saying &quot;Hard work is required&quot; is probably the easiest thing a person can say. It&#039;s a wide-accepted truism that feels extremely comfortable; it fits very nicely inside our cultural norms. We hear &quot;You have to *want* it&quot; from sports casters, teachers, employment counselors, and so on. 

But it&#039;s OT for this post, if you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to make a couple of responses here: </p>
<p>First, this is going to be a series of posts, so I&#8217;ll be talking about working in the near future. It&#8217;s separate from the issue of whether a person *can* be creative. </p>
<p>Second, once you start talking about how people become successful, now to define success, and what motivates successful people, you venture onto very thin ice. None of this is simple or straightforward. </p>
<p>Third, saying &#8220;Hard work is required&#8221; is probably the easiest thing a person can say. It&#8217;s a wide-accepted truism that feels extremely comfortable; it fits very nicely inside our cultural norms. We hear &#8220;You have to *want* it&#8221; from sports casters, teachers, employment counselors, and so on. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s OT for this post, if you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Blog Project: Creativity by Duncan Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6071#comment-9108</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Eagleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6071#comment-9108</guid>
		<description>The initial claim - that anyone CAN be creative - does have some validity, I think.  But the author has missed the boat with the whole belief thing.  Not that belief in your own creativity doesn&#039;t help - it  certainly does, and, yes, disbelief can discourage you from trying.  But (IMO) desire is more important than belief.  Just anecdotal evidence, of course, but all the most creative people I know are compelled to create by an inner impulse that just won&#039;t be denied.  If they&#039;re not full time professional creatives, and they work a boring 9-to-5 rent-paying job, then they write novels on their lunch hour, they paint on the weekend, they spend their nights and weekends playing music, or whatever.  When others are kicking back to watch the game, or going out to clubs, or playing frisbee in the park, those folks are pounding away at the keyboard, practicing their chords, working at the easel.

I&#039;ve seen plenty of previously &quot;non-creatives&quot; try their hand at various artistic disciplines, some do well, some do poorly, but all of them either keep at it or give up based not on their belief, but on their desire.  If you want it bad enough, you&#039;ll keep at it, learn to do better.

For the most successful creatives (&quot;success&quot; in this context  meaning &quot;creative success,&quot; not &quot;commercial success&quot;), it&#039;s not about the result, it&#039;s about the process.  Cool as it is to show off your new painting or share your latest song or short story (and yes, it&#039;s very cool, we all have egos, or we wouldn&#039;t be doing this stuff...), what really keeps these folks going back to the easel or keyboard is the high they get from the process of creating something.  If that high grabs you, you&#039;ll be compelled to come back to it, whether you believe your results are &quot;creative&quot; or not.

Now, I&#039;ll grant you, neither desire nor belief is enough in and of itself.  I&#039;ve known (as you probably have) people with a ton of desire and a buttload of belief, who just can&#039;t get their perspective or anatomy right, or whose stories continue to be cliche-ridden and boring, whose music is awkward and derivative.  But that&#039;s not about &quot;Can you be creative?&quot; so much as &quot;How do you get better at it?&quot;   Which I&#039;ll leave alone for the moment, since it&#039;s addressed in subsequent paragraphs.

Just my own .02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initial claim &#8211; that anyone CAN be creative &#8211; does have some validity, I think.  But the author has missed the boat with the whole belief thing.  Not that belief in your own creativity doesn&#8217;t help &#8211; it  certainly does, and, yes, disbelief can discourage you from trying.  But (IMO) desire is more important than belief.  Just anecdotal evidence, of course, but all the most creative people I know are compelled to create by an inner impulse that just won&#8217;t be denied.  If they&#8217;re not full time professional creatives, and they work a boring 9-to-5 rent-paying job, then they write novels on their lunch hour, they paint on the weekend, they spend their nights and weekends playing music, or whatever.  When others are kicking back to watch the game, or going out to clubs, or playing frisbee in the park, those folks are pounding away at the keyboard, practicing their chords, working at the easel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen plenty of previously &#8220;non-creatives&#8221; try their hand at various artistic disciplines, some do well, some do poorly, but all of them either keep at it or give up based not on their belief, but on their desire.  If you want it bad enough, you&#8217;ll keep at it, learn to do better.</p>
<p>For the most successful creatives (&#8220;success&#8221; in this context  meaning &#8220;creative success,&#8221; not &#8220;commercial success&#8221;), it&#8217;s not about the result, it&#8217;s about the process.  Cool as it is to show off your new painting or share your latest song or short story (and yes, it&#8217;s very cool, we all have egos, or we wouldn&#8217;t be doing this stuff&#8230;), what really keeps these folks going back to the easel or keyboard is the high they get from the process of creating something.  If that high grabs you, you&#8217;ll be compelled to come back to it, whether you believe your results are &#8220;creative&#8221; or not.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ll grant you, neither desire nor belief is enough in and of itself.  I&#8217;ve known (as you probably have) people with a ton of desire and a buttload of belief, who just can&#8217;t get their perspective or anatomy right, or whose stories continue to be cliche-ridden and boring, whose music is awkward and derivative.  But that&#8217;s not about &#8220;Can you be creative?&#8221; so much as &#8220;How do you get better at it?&#8221;   Which I&#8217;ll leave alone for the moment, since it&#8217;s addressed in subsequent paragraphs.</p>
<p>Just my own .02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ray Lilly survives yet again by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6163#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6163#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>Griping over the voting and the writeups is a time-honored tradition. Everyone thinks their support for their favorite character is the height of rationality while support for the other one is all about popularity and cheating. It wouldn&#039;t be Cage Match without it. 

But I seriously do love their passion for the books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griping over the voting and the writeups is a time-honored tradition. Everyone thinks their support for their favorite character is the height of rationality while support for the other one is all about popularity and cheating. It wouldn&#8217;t be Cage Match without it. </p>
<p>But I seriously do love their passion for the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ray Lilly survives yet again by Harry Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6163#comment-9101</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harryjconnolly.com/blog/?p=6163#comment-9101</guid>
		<description>Monday at 10 am, if I recall correctly. I&#039;m writing the matchup right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday at 10 am, if I recall correctly. I&#8217;m writing the matchup right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

